Thursday, May 26, 2011

Why "I Kissed Dating Goodbye" Empowers Passive Men

Yes, I read the book.  14 years later it is still doing damage on the Christian community.  I'm not attacking the author, but it was written out of frustration when he was dating like crazy and not guarding one's heart, which was admitted in the book, and dating ends up being the scapegoat.  He jettisons hundreds of years of dating tradition that has worked well for men & women alike in western society for an unrealistic courtship method that creates undue pressure for both sexes.  Dating is denounced, and courtship is praised as the "biblical" way.  If one wanted to be "biblical", ask your parents for an arranged marriage.

This whole courtship idea also panders to the passive man, and their not asking the girl just justifies their passivity, expecting God to drop "the right girl" in their lap.  Passiveness is man's biggest problem, so suck it up cupcake.  World Mag has an excellent article with great interviews on how ideas in "I Kissed Dating Goodbye" has permiated Christian thinking and is creating more single Christians than it is helping (big thanks to my amazing girlfriend for finding this article). http://www.worldmag.com/articles/18064

Guys, suck it up and ask the girl out.  You might be surprised how often a girl will say yes instead of no.  Your not asking for her hand in marriage, your asking for a date, and dating is intentionally getting to know someone that may eventually lead into marriage.  I understand guarding your heart, and wanting to make sure "she is the one", but how will you ever know if you don't ask a few girls out?  At the same time, be discerning, don't be a "dating whore" and be known for dating every cute girl who walks by.

Luckily there are other Christian authors who know dating is a perfectly acceptable way to find a mate.

Friday, May 20, 2011

The God Who Judges

Is God all love, or all wrath?  Why is God's judgement avoided or even dismissed in the case of Rob Bell's new book? Would a loving God judge?  Jon Nitta of EV Free Fullerton knocks it out of the park with a necessary lesson that most churches today avoid.  MP3 link

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Healthcare Waiver Request

To: Kathleen.Sebelius@HHS.gov, healthinsurance@hhs.gov

Dear President Obama and Secretary Sebelius,

Just as 1,040 businesses, five entire states, and powerful labor unions have received waivers from harmful provisions of ObamaCare, I also want to receive a waiver from those that harm ME! I respectfully request that you grant me a waiver from the law's:
  -Effective elimination of consumer-driven plans like HSA\'s
  -Taxpayer funding of abortion
  -$1 trillion in Medicare cuts
  -$500 billion in tax increases
  -Employer mandate to provide health insurance
  -Individual mandate to purchase health insurance

Sincerely,
Jason Rasmussen

Monday, February 14, 2011

Geek Valentines Poem

Roses are #FF0000
Violets are #0000FF
All my base
are belong to you

Wednesday, February 09, 2011

Pissing Money & Resources Away - When Going Green is Not Green

If you are a male, you have likely seen these waterless urinals, either by Sloan or Falcon.  No water!  That must save the company that installs them tons of money as well as be good for the environment, right?  I knew there was a catch.

For those that have not used them, or for the female readers, my first problem with waterless urinals is the fact that they smell funny.  With no water to flush away the waste, bathrooms with these urinals always have this slight odor of stale urine, and some even have a sewer odor (more on this later).  There is also often "debris" left on them that never is flushed away as well.  But here is the real catch that most don't know, these waterless urinals have special cartridges that need to be changed, according to the manufacturer, every 7,000 uses.  These cartridges cost $40 each.  Lets do some simple math.  I don't have actual bathroom stats, but lets say an establishment has 4 of these, is open 15 hours a day, and each urinal is used 15 times an hour.  That is 225 times per day, per urinal, which means the 7,000 use limit is used in one month.  $40 per cartridge per urinal (not factoring in tax & shipping) is $160 per month or $1,920 per year.  If these were flush toilets, water costs $0.0031 per gallon, and the industry standard 1 gallon per flush of a water urinal means $86 a month or $1037 a year in water costs.  That water cost could be even less for urinals that use less than a gallon per flush or because people often don't flush urinals.  (Update: even simpler math, 1 flush = $0.003 per use VS. $40 cartridge / 7000 uses = $0.006 per use).  This means "going green" will cost you 100% more!

What about that sewer odor that is sometimes smelled in bathrooms using waterless urinals I mentioned above?  Water urinals have a special water based valve that does not need replacing which prohibits sewer gas from coming back into the bathroom.  Waterless urinals instead rely on a special vegetable-oil based sealant cartridge which must be changed often or else the seal is compromised resulting in sewer gas entering the restroom which creates a health hazard.  So anytime it smells funny in bathrooms with waterless urinals, it is a health hazard because the establishment is not changing their urinal cartridges often enough.  Plus for all the greenie hipsters out there, these cartridges just add to the landfills.

I'm all in favor for being a good steward of the Earth, and I'm all for alternative energy, but only if it makes sense, saves money, actually saves resources and optimizes things creating a noticeable improvement.  "Global Warming" or "Climate Change" whatever you want to call it, is a farce.  "Going Green" is all about emotional pandering, and is almost always more wasteful, causes more harm, and costs more; but it gives people a warm & fuzzy green feeling, which is apparently more important instead.

So the next time you take a pee in an old-skool water based urinal, know that your saving money, being a good steward of the environment, and are being more sanitary than the "green" alternatives.